Punishing Individuals Committing Crimes

Question: Discuss about the Punishing Individuals Committing Crimes. Answer: Introduction: Prisons as a form of punishing individuals committing crimes have existed from the earliest human societies. The extent to which prisons have been successful in reforming criminals has been a topic of debate for long, with opponents claiming that education can be more effective in curbing crimes. My opinion is this regard is that prisons are required for taking crime rate in control and education cannot be the solely successful in curbing crimes. Individuals when having a fear of imprisonment have the tendency not to commit crimes. The fear works as a significant disincentive. Education is noteworthy in creating general awareness among the population regarding the impact of crime. However, I do not agree with the fact that education has the potential to solve all the issues that plague the society due to crime. Individuals when educated and made aware of the impact of the consequences of crime are less inclined towards committing the crime. However, having the belief that education a lone can reform the criminal mindset and entire humanity is not justified. This statement is supported by the fact that many people who commit the crimes are well aware of the impact of such needs on humanity. Lack of education does not prompt them to commit such crime. To conclude, awareness can be created through adequate education; however, there is a need of prisons for curbing crime in the society. With an increase in the population across the globe, there is a proportionate increase in the garbage that is being accumulated from the household. The result of this is an increasing area of landfills in these countries. It is necessary to highlight the causes of this imperative problem and the necessary strategies for combating it. The trash from the households is taken to the landfills where they get buried under the soil in layers. Decomposition of these trashes may take hundreds of years in some cases. The proportion of materials taking comparatively more time for decomposition is more. Household garbage includes food wastes, glass materials, plastic materials, metal pieces and fabric shreds. Since the decomposition takes many years, the landfills get overloaded every year. Since lack of education and awareness is a concerning factor, awareness campaigns are to be run at grass root levels for combating the issue. A proper dumping and collecting system would be beneficial for dif ferent kinds of materials. Non-bio-degradable materials need to be taken out from the household wastes and put in the recycling plant. Natural wastes can be composted as an outstanding solution. To conclude, since land filling and waste deposition is a rising issue in the present era, a number of beneficial approaches are to be made for making reducing he impact on society. In the contemporary world, technology has evolved to play the role of human interpreters and translators. This may have proven to be helpful in the process of reducing language barrier; however, I have the belief the human translators and interpreters hold more importance. Though an electronic translator may be fast, it fails to convey the accurate intention and message that speech in context holds. Electronic translators are not capable of translating the manner in which speech is given. It is therefore not capable of expressing the real intention of that comment made. The misunderstanding may arise due to his approach. Another disadvantage is that body language cannot be translated through an electronic translator. Body languages are very important when communication happens. Moreover, automated applications and software used for translation are dependent to a large extent on the internet for their function, which needs human translators. In spite of the fact that electronic transl ators increase self-reliance and independency, it cannot be considered as the preferred option always. From the above discussion, it can be concluded that electronic translators fall short of delivery and accuracy, indicating that it is not better than human translators and interpreters. A major challenge that the workforce in the present time faces is the lack of interpersonal skills among the newly graduates. Businesses are found to be facing problems due to the incapability of new employees to exhibit these skills. The chief reason can be attributed to the educational organisations failing to provide training to the students adequately. Interpersonal skills are required for effective interaction and communication between individuals in all organisations. It has been reported that young professionals who enter the workforce do not have much ability to go beyond the level of academics. Some areas where they are found to be lacking appropriate skills are an ability to work collaboratively in teams, ability to have a proficient demeanor, ability to communicate properly. All these factors lead to loss of productivity in the business. A major reason for this is that universities do not focus on independent research skills, critical thinking, and communication. This resu lts in the absence of required soft skills. A solution for this can be an administration of skills assessment after delivery of training. Another valuable approach can be a partnership between colleges and business organisations. In closing, it can be said that practical solutions are to be taken up for a development of interpersonal behaviours among new employees. Conclusion: Constructing buildings has always been considered as a complex process as there is the need of fulfilling the basic purpose of construction as well as the need of making it look distinguished. While success has been achieved by some buildings in integrating both the aspects, a section of them are inclined towards only one of the two aspects. There are some prominent examples of buildings that are rich in artistry as well as strong in the construction. Palace of Westminster in England and the Taj Mahal in India are cultural symbols with sturdy construction. It can be therefore stated that constructing a structure with both art and purpose is possible. On the other hand, there have been architectural disasters due to improper construction and inadequate planning though the intention was to make a symbol of artwork. Important features of construction have not been given attention while putting the emphasis on their outer appearance. Buildings have collapsed due to miscalculations in the ir planning. These examples highlight whether appearance is to be sidelined for the sole reason of structural stability. As per my opinion, any building must possess a combination of stability and style. Equal importance needs to be given to appearance and purpose of construction while planning a building.